Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
- Thank you for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir
- a (major aspects):
Done Added mention/ref to address this concern.
- Thanks for sorting this out
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- OK
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- OK
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)- OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: