This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Hi,
The Google test shows way more results for this English rendering of his name so I have redirected Suleman Daud Khan here. If this is against consensus, please feel free to revert me. Curro2 (talk) 09:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia insists examiner DOT com is on its Spam blacklist. The only problem is that is not on the blacklist. Why can't I save the link properly? Curro2 (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is on the blacklist. See MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. The Examiner has been deemed by the community to be completely unreliable and has been banned from use on all Wikipedia articles. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Stabila711 (talk) 02:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weird, I did not see it in the list. I find this pre-emptive block extremely annoying. It's one thing to notify users that sources are undesired but blocking a news site altogether feels obstructive. Curro2 (talk) 02:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well it is this line: (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$). And if you can only find the information from the examiner it really shouldn't be included anyways. The examiner is not a news site and has absolutely no oversight. Anyone can say anything they want on there. If you want to try to get it unlisted you can try MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#Proposed removals but I really wouldn't bank on it happening. --Stabila711 (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
