Talk:Miracle-Ear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Miracle-Ear. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False Advertising Allegations[edit]

A national advertising campaign that Dahlberg, Inc. ran for Miracle Ear from 1988 until mid-1993 was subject to charges of false advertising by the Federal Trade Commission, which were settled in 1995 when the company agreed to pay a $2.75 million civil penalty.


"FTC Garners $2.75 Million Civil Penalty In Settlement Of False Advertising Charges Against Maker Of "Miracle-Ear" Hearing Aids". U.S. Federal Trade Commission. 1995-11-21. Archived from the original on 2011-06-06. Retrieved 2010-03-29.

I strongly believe this should be included considering they took the time in the company history section to mention how in 1993 the product was capable of performing everything claimed in advertising. I feel this is only half the story and an obvious lie of omission. The article should point out it took until 1993 to have a product that was capable of doing what the previous product was falsely claimed to have done since 1988.

I lack the skills to properly edit and document Wikipedia pages. I am hopeful somebody with the proper skills and experience will be able use this information and format it properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.68.109 (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The press release describing the FTC settlement is here Captain Puget (talk) 03:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]