Jump to content

Talk:Miracles of Gautama Buddha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality

[edit]

What not neutral about this? Its taken from the Pali Canons or the Buddhist scriptures --138.88.28.96 05:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not neutral because non-Buddhists, and some modernist Buddhists, deny it. Therefore, under Wikipedia definitions, it is an opinion, not a fact, and should be stated as such. See WP:NPOV for details. Peter jackson (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that these powers are a side-effect is wrong. The Samannaphala Sutta and other texts explicitly state that they are deliberately developed. Peter jackson (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhism/Christiantiny?

[edit]

Hmm... Buddha walked on water, eh? WHERE could I have heard THAT before?

Oh wait, didn't Jesus supposedly do that?

Interesting... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.31.125 (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think its worth mentioning that Buddha lived aproximately 5 to 6 centuries before Jesus.85.167.132.128 (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very concerned about the statement here that Buddha himself walked on water because the source cited is not reliable. No account of this incident is discussed in that book. Rather, the book shows a picture of a stone carving, and the author asserts that it depicts Buddha walking on water, but anyone who takes an actual look at the picture will see that it does not clearly portray any such thing. If you're going to include this miracle, you need to provide a more reliable source, preferably the original source of the story in the Buddhist texts themselves. I personally have never been able to find such a source in these texts (in fact, I have never found ANY other source stating this story except the book cited here), so if anyone knows of one, please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alg0207 (talkcontribs) 05:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources here are reliable and are wrong

[edit]

This whole section is created by self published web articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.188.230.214 (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miracles of Gautama Buddha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]