A fact from Miray Cin appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Created by CeeGee (talk). Self-nominated at 12:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
This is my assessment. First for the article itself:
Newness: ✓Pass; created from scratched on October 28
Length: ✗ Fail; excluding the lead, the prose section consists of less than 1,500 characters, and this already includes characters for footnotes such as "[#]".
Within policy: ✓Pass; neutral, cites sources with inline citations, Earwig's Copyvio Detector says it's ok. I'm a bit concerned that some appearances are cited to box scores and not actual match reports.
For the hook:
Format: ✓Pass
Content: ✓Pass; yet another athlete who played for a country in the youth ranks but transferred to another country in the senior level, but I suppose that's still not usual enough for it to be not "not interesting".
Other:
QPQ: Done
Picture: Not applicable
Overall": Only length is keeping this from the main page. Are you able to source a direct quote from her? That can length the article good enough for it to pass. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. The prose portion of the article is 1,629 characters long acoording to "DYK check" tool exceeding the minimum legth of 1,500 stated in the "Article 2" criteria. Please recheck. CeeGee 10:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For articles that have a lead, I personally do not include WP:LEAD in character counts, as leads are just a summary of the rest of the prose. I know this is not the one recommended by the "rules," but this is something I do myself when doing QPQs. Howard the Duck (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean that your personal criteria is superior to to the DYK rules? CeeGee 09:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to seek other people who'd review otherwise. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've actually used this standard on my other reviews, and people actually complied. Maybe because it made the article better? I dunno. The article as it stands right now is at its barest possible minimum outside of a stub. Character counts on a lead, which is a summary of the rest of article, doesn't add anything of substance to the actual article. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Taking it from here, all the characters of prose including the lead total 1,810 characters. Not including the lead, it is still above 1,500 characters, although by only 58. As per Howard the Duck, this meets all other requirements. Will review the hook later. Heythereimaguy (talk) 20:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't seem to mention any U15 team Nevermind, all I had to do was scroll.
Okay then, this seems good to go. The hook is cited in the article (German and Turkish sources AGF) and short enough, but I will hyperlink U15, U16, and U17 to help readers understand the hook better. @CeeGee: congratulations, this passes! Heythereimaguy (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Only length is keeping this from the main page. Are you able to source a direct quote from her? That can length the article good enough for it to pass. Howard the Duck (talk) 18:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
CeeGee 09:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Okay then, this seems good to go. The hook is cited in the article (German and Turkish sources AGF) and short enough, but I will hyperlink U15, U16, and U17 to help readers understand the hook better. @CeeGee: congratulations, this passes! Heythereimaguy (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
