Talk:Miska, Tulkarm
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
what this needs
[edit]would be interesting to see the reaction to this, both then and now. also how both side see the event, i predict some big difference of opinion of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.149.183 (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
settlements: wrong info on Palestineremembered-site.
[edit]Just now, the article say that the Israeli settlements of Ein HaHoresh, Givat Haim and Ahituv are on village land. I see this is taken from http://www.palestineremembered.com/Tulkarm/Miska/
BUT: Khalidi writes something completely different! Namely, that Sde Warburg and Mishmeret are on village land. This from ILA also indicate that it is Khalidi who has got it right, as they refer to a complaint from Mishmeret.
In short: I suspect Palestineremembered really messed this one up, so I will change it to what Khalidi writes. Regards, Huldra (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Update: it seems as if the Pal.rem-site mixed up Miska with Al-Manshiyya, Tulkarm; they have the exact same info about Israeli settlements in both places. According to Khalidi; Pal.rem. is right about Al-Manshiyya, Tulkarm, and wrong about Miska. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 11:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)