Talk:Miss Bimbo

Bimbo rocks. don't listen to what other people sayyy :] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.243.90.103 (talk) 10:21, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

This game has been receiving tough criticism for its pushing of body image to a young female traget audience. Saw it on one of the morning "news" programs here in Aus.--ZayZayEM (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Link

To the author of this article: please stick to your native language wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.208.161.54 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Bias in the Article

I thought that this article appeared very clearly biased. I'm a 23 year old Miss Bimbo player, and I'll admit that I logged on due to the controversy. I expected to be horrified by the game. However, despite the emphasis on beauty, players are also strongly encouraged to train for jobs, study at the library, and otherwise improve their lives.

I'm not saying the game is perfect, but it isn't as bad as the article is making it out to be. According to the MSNBC article "Don't Blame Miss Bimbo," a lot of the players on Miss Bimbo are older. I know a lot of people who are playing the game that are in their mid twenties.

Although plastic surgery is a definite option, it isn't necessary to move up. What is necessary is getting a job, feeding your character, buying clothes, renting an apartment, and other parts of real adult life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.94.159 (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Anyways, apparently the whole point of the website was satire. They're making fun of bimbos... I think. Serpentine17ice (talk) 06:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

If what I have currently written is considered biased, please edit it slightly, but please do leave in about the changes to the site and the falling out with Ma Bimbo. I do not know the reason for it, but I know it has occured (I frequently the Miss Bimbo forums and have read much of what is going on including the banning of the use of French on the forums.) I also deleted the Ma Bimbo link from the page as both sites say they now have nothing to do with one another. Alerya (talk) 19:57, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Protected

Enough. Keep your complaints out of here, Wikipedia is not a battleground for events happening elsewhere. I've protected this article for 72 hours. If that's not enough, I'll extend the protection until it stops. --Rodhullandemu 01:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe thatAlerya may be using multiple identities this I feel falls under the three edits rule for banning people WP:3RR Dwanyewest (talk) 02:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I am not using multiple accounts. I had been away at work from approximately 2:30 EST until 10:45 EST, which was when many of the edits occurred and this is the first time I have touched it since I last edited anything. I have no reason to use multiple accounts, and I am offended that you would accuse me of such a thing. Others have taken what I had posted, changed it and reposted it. That is not my doing. Please refrain from trying to spread rumors; it is highly unbecoming. Alerya (talk) 03:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

FYI

• Removed per WP:TALK. This is not a WP:SOAPBOX for your rants. --Rodhullandemu 09:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss Bimbo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411051237/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jkwCpdg-qlE7A-JESbh5LXPJe9QQ to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jkwCpdg-qlE7A-JESbh5LXPJe9QQ

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)