Talk:Miss Sloane

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Canada: Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Premise[edit]

" "The Gun Lobby" (that pales in comparison to almost every other lobbying group in existence)"

Is this phrase from an official description of the movie or some other authoritative movie site? If so, it's going to need documentation. If not, it just sounds like the wiki section author's opinion.69.254.183.6 (talk) 03:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Joke used in the film[edit]

A priest offered a lift to a Nun. She got in and crossed her legs, forcing her gown to reveal a leg. The priest nearly had an accident. After controlling the car, he stealthily slid his hand up her leg. The nun said,”Father, remember Luke 14:10?” The priest removed his hand. But,changing gears, he let his hand slide up her leg again. The nun once again said, “Father, remember Luke 14:10?” The priest apologized “Sorry sister but the flesh is weak.” Arriving at the convent, the nun went on her way. On his arrival at the church, the priest rushed to look up Luke 14:10. It said, “Go forth and seek, further up, you will find glory.”

Moral of the story: If you are not well informed in your job, you might miss a great opportunity.69.254.183.6 (talk) 03:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.248.62.21 (talk) [reply]

Budget[edit]

In the 2016 bilan of film productions in France, that can be download on the CNC website, the numbers indicated for the budget is € 18,36 million (so much more than $13 million).Herve.toullec (talk) 16:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you found it already then it is unhelpful to expect other people to go look for it again, next time provide a link.

Both Indiewire and The Numbers.com[1] reported that the budget was $18 million, that is American dollars, no mention of Euros. Deadline reported a lower figure of $13 million before P&A. {{Infobox film}} says if in doubt include the figures as a range. That means the Infobox should list the budget as $13-18 million and if anyone changes it without further discussion it should be restored to that range. -- 109.79.75.242 (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miss Sloane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160420090152/http://www.ssninsider.com/on-the-set-for-4816-ridley-scott-michael-fassbender-start-alien-covenant-benedict-cumberbatch-wraps-doctor-strange/ to http://www.ssninsider.com/on-the-set-for-4816-ridley-scott-michael-fassbender-start-alien-covenant-benedict-cumberbatch-wraps-doctor-strange/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]