Talk:Mk F3 155 mm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can't find pics in "Commons"...[edit]

Hi All, I was unable to find "free" pics (neither in "Commons" nor in the "Wikipedia"s I usually consult), to illustrate this article. I'll upload a couple "low-resolution", based on some I've found in Internet, and will quote where I took them from. If someone can help with more adequate pics, will appreciate that.
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist assessment[edit]

I think it is not yet a B class article, as I wonder whether it meets the 2nd criteria: It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. It seems to cover reasonably well the topic but not in any detail. So to me is a Start.
It will need quite a few work to get it to GA, but IMHO it's a good work so far. Regards, DPdH (talk) 02:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: criterion 1 & 5 are partially met (no inline citatiosn; no pics or diagrams yet). Will try to improve those in the next few days, Regards, DPdH (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion[edit]

what a monster, "overkill"... alone the weight per round... was it because of this that only ~600 were produced for (today) still in use by France, Saudi-Arabia, Morocco and Argentina? I mean sounds weak, but at least the Saudis and France of course got a nice budget and modern equipment. I think Saudis bought the Panzerhaubitze 2000 from Germany, but this here 17.410 tons, the PzHb 2000 has lowest empty weight (almost dry^^) of 49 tons, up to 55.66 tons for latest version with a special roof protection. So hard to compare it but both are motorized howitzer?! Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mk F3 155mm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Operators[edit]

Hi Wikipedians, 10 years after my last review the operators list is unchanged... surely some no longer has it in service? Can't find sources to update this, any help would be appreciated. Thanks and regards, DPdH (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]