Talk:Mob

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request. History swap performed as redirect has a significant page history and was a merge source into the content here. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MOB → Mob — Primary meaning is a crowd of people etc. It is ridiculous to call this article "MOB" because there some MOB acronyms around. "MOB" can be made a redirect to "Mob" anyway. Penbat (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support for reasons stated. Most people typing Mob or mob will be looking for the crowd (despite the fact that we don't actually have an article directly about mobs). — Amakuru (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Page view stats for the two are identical, suggesting that everyone is arriving at MOB via the Mob redirect. May as well take them straight there. PC78 (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per WP:DABNAME, word is to be preferred over acronym for disambiguation page name. —chaos5023 (talk) 23:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Harp, harp - what about "Crowd"?

'twas the info I sought by searching for "mob" - could it not be listed under "behavioral phenomena"?

T 88.89.219.147 (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Nick Number (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged. T 88.89.219.147 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]