Talk:Mobile payment/Archives/2015
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Mobile QR - IP
Hi all,
I'd like to propose the following addition that I think is relevant as this invention being judged as one of the six most likely to have the biggest impact on the mobile industry over the next ten years at this year's Mobile World Congress.
Does anyone have objections, observations or ideally improvements please?
On the 13th of June 2012 a British company Ensygnia Ltd was granted a patent by the UK patent office[1] which covered usage of a visual cryptogram for a range of actions including registration, log-in, payment authorisation and shopping[2][3].
Thanks Amicaveritas (talk) 10:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Your recent addition of Ensygnia contains no encyclopedic content. This company owns patents, which may be appropriate for the company's article, but what do any of them have to do with mobile payments? What is the significance? (ps: edit waring through IP use is not useful.)--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:11, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Concur with Loriendrew; I've removed the material for now until someone can explain why this is anything notable. I've also removed some other unsourced nonsense and requested additional cites. Kuru (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can you explain why the leading companies in this space - along with associated IP are not notable or encyclopaedic? This is a landmark patent within the space of QR payments. The industry considers it & the company to be of note in this space, so surely someone reading about QR payments will consider it to be of note also. When Lorienandrew removed the content originally the only complaint was it was not referenced. It was then suitably referenced to industry leading publications. The satisfies weight criteria. If you view the language as puffery - which ok, it could be improved, it would be more constructive to edit the language to be more neutral. The relevance can be clearly understood by anyone who is an expert in this field and is exactly the sort of encyclopaedic information they would be interested in. I added the second point, not as puffery but to illustrate the notability. 80.5.65.163 (talk) 14:56, 17 July 2015 (UT
- Concur with Loriendrew; I've removed the material for now until someone can explain why this is anything notable. I've also removed some other unsourced nonsense and requested additional cites. Kuru (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Mobile payment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111123155552/http://www.wirelessintelligence.com:80/mobile-money to http://www.wirelessintelligence.com/mobile-money
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070926213007/http://www.infodev.org/files/3014_file_infoDev.Report_m_Commerce_January.2006.pdf to http://www.infodev.org/files/3014_file_infoDev.Report_m_Commerce_January.2006.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110226032146/http://www.voilafoundation.com:80/t-cash.htm to http://www.voilafoundation.com/t-cash.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)