Talk:Model rocket motor classification

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Rocketry

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Toys

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

not high enough

SRB thrust profile

The chart doesn't go high enough. Assuming that after Z it should go ZZ, ZZZ, ZZZZ, ZZZZZ the space shuttle boosters should be approximately ZZZZZ10000000. 72.40.45.79 (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually ... model rocket motor designations only go up to E or G depending on your definition of "model rocket." The current definition based on FAA regulations limits model rockets to a G motor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadebox (talk • contribs) 21:06, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Seems to me like this page should be renamed, considering rocket impulse classes that are far beyond consumer-grade are listed (i.e. Shuttle SRB.) 76.174.237.125 (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written

Someone please flag this page. It reads like a blog article. Saad Mirza (talk) 22:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Model rocket motor classification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160425210118/http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets/Diverse/Impulse/index.htm to http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets/Diverse/Impulse/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liquid rocket engines (e.g. Rocketdyne F-1) do not belong on this chart. This chart goes by impulse, which depends almost entirely on the size of the propellant tanks. Putting the entire Saturn 1-C stage on here would make sense, but not the engine by itself.

Advertisements in chart

Somebody please review the chart's use of links to commercial products, all by the same vendor. The 1/2A, A, C, and D classifications all have links to a commercial website called bnbrockets.com and takes the user directly to pages where they can purchase products. This is all in the "Aerospace Vehicle or Rocket(s)" column. If we're going to point to typical model rockets, shouldn't we point to pages such as rocketreviews.com, where it's not giving free marketing to a specific company? Kemkerj3 (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to say the same, it looks like advertising. The linked pages have no obvious mention of the actual motors used to achieve said impulse either. 2001:7D0:8C42:B400:A288:69FF:FE94:F2E6 (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University rocketry teams are also adding their in-the-scheme-of-things insignificant rockets. More examples for each class is a good thing but this is ridiculous. See both GTXR rockets and THRUST TU-1 as examples. Mostmadmonkey (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]