Talk:Moira (military)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

anachronism?

From its name I would think it a Meros (Merẽ)/Turma. From its commander's title its a Drungus/Chilliarchy and from its unit tree half the Imperial Tagmata. Could this be a modern term that the author used to identify a portion of the Byzantine military administration?What ever it is it needs attention. Opinions and information is greatly appreaciated. --Dryzen 13:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other than for our own article (to be found on many other sites) I can`t find a web mention of this type of formation.--Dryzen 13:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone mind if I delete this or change it to Meros?--Dryzen 13:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

I propose moving Moirae (military) --> Meros, a more common (in english literature such as Treagold or Haldon) name for what seems to be the same Byzantine formation. --Dryzen 18:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

As the presenter of this move I support, due to too many inconsistancies (includint the title) within the article prior ot displacement.--Dryzen 19:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]