Talk:Monandrous
Appearance
![]() | The contents of the Monandrous page were merged into Stamen on 14 February 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 March 2022. The result of the discussion was merge. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
This article is unuseful. It should redirect to stamen or orchidaceae. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelwyn (talk • contribs) 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- It also contradicts Orchidaceae about whether the primitive orchid had one or three stamens. I'd probably say we should redirect to wiktionary (or transwiki, or whatever the procedure is - I'm not saying the text currently at Monandrous is worth keeping). Trying to turn Orchidaceae or Stamen into a long list of term definitions is not likely to be good for those articles. Kingdon 13:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
What about in humans? Among my gay friends, monandrous is a preferred substitute term for monogamous. Ydhirsch (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- If that's right, then that detail should be included in the article monogamy. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a dictionary, so things are grouped according to what they are, not what they're called. dummelaksen (talk • contribs) 21:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)