Talk:Money in the Bank (2018)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 09:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 05:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll start reviewing this nomination on Sunday. It looks promising so far. Veera Narayana 05:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

This article is well-written and the research is solid. I don't see any significant issues here that would influence my decision. I feel this can be promoted to GA status. Nicely done, Ssven2. Veera Narayana 15:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, Veera Narayana.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)