Jump to content

Talk:Monty Can't Buy Me Love/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 15:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • Wikilink Mr Burns in lead
  • Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
  • You use the word "wrote" a lot in the reception section. Perhaps trying adding a bit more flavor and use different words?
  • Add quotation marks to The Joy of Sect

Just makes suggested changes above and it will be good to go. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 15:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Queenieacoustic (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome job. Pass for GA Ruby2010 comment! 18:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]