Talk:Morgans Hotel Group
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ian Schrager
[edit]Ian Schrager is no longer affiliated with Morgans Hotel Group and they are striving to build their brand away from a partner Ian Schrager, who was not the only founder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgenerale (talk • contribs) 20:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please note, Ian Shrager is not to be mentioned on this page. If you would like to discuss this please email me at bgenerale (at) zetainteractive.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgenerale (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, noted. Now the fact is that this opinion does not change history. It is fine to correct errors and improve the article. But the article is not owned by Morgans and it sure sounds like your edits are either vandalism or WP:COI or maybe even both. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Your views of their history aren't as accurate as theirs - please visit their about us page on site, to get a more accurate reflection of the past. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgenerale (talk • contribs) 15:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe you can help by explaining what is fact and not someones views. I have no view on this except that you seem to be revising history without any citations. You remove information that was sourced and in place for a period of time with no reliable sources to say that what was previously sourced is in fact wrong. If someone was a founder, and that fact was sourced, then he is a founder. If that was in error, then you need to provide a source that can confirm the change you are making. I have no idea what the correct answer is. I'm objecting to what may be a COI edit without sources. If anything, this page would seem to support the current wording. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.hotelmanagement-network.com/features/feature1109/
- Triggered by
\bhotelmanagement-network\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)