Talk:Morocco–United States relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ancient Al Moroccan Empire and it's capital is ancient Morocco aka Amexem aka Amuurka aka Tamerika aka Americo and is over 10,000 years old and the kingdom of Morocco which is within the Moroccan Empire is less than 100 years old.

Untitled[edit]

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 01:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bases[edit]

Should mention Sidi Slimane AB (hmm, no article) and Nouasseur AB... AnonMoos (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

by the way: an article that deals with the US-moroccan relations and pays not in any way attention to the fact, that there were SAC bases in Morocco, ca. 1951-1963. A circumstance that could have resulted in nuclear devastation for that country. A bit weak, to say the least... --129.187.244.28 (talk) 08:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Press article "hosted" on Google News site[edit]

Those links are valid only for a short time, and the one in the article doesn't work any more. AnonMoos (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nine-ambassador letter to Obama[edit]

moroccoonthemove.com/2013/11/18/nine-former-us-ambassadors-urge-obama-strengthen-strategic-partnership-morocco#sthash.r4f2z7Et.LHYcesr0.dpbs

24.185.2.85 (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Morocco–United States relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara issue update December 2020[edit]

Article may need to be updated. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-and-morocco-to-establish-full-official-relations-trump-announces/ One-Off Contributor (talk) 17:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Early History[edit]

I believe that the early history 1700s history should be better organized and cleaned up. There are few to no sources and one comment describes a secret service between 1775-76. Dansondelta47 (talk) 21:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the first sentence of the section 1777-1787 has been completely removed of any context. As far as I can tell, there was more information about something being coordinated with the "secret service" but was deleted two years ago, without explanation. I wonder if it was placed in the wrong section, i.e. should've been in post-Civil War, or if the person to delete the context also meant to delete the first sentence. In any case, the article can be immediately improved by deleting the sentence that makes reference to the secret service, as it works perfectly fine without it and there is no source or any greater context. IAustonFox (talk) 07:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]