Talk:Mother Solomon/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
This seems like an interesting subject, and I'm more than happy to return the favor for your review of Worlds (Porter Robinson album)! Expect comments in the next couple of days. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! By the way, I recently received the biography mentioned in the article through WP:RX. It would be useful for fleshing out details, which I'll be getting around to, but I still believe the article addresses the main points. Anywho, hope you enjoy! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: That sounds great! Would you prefer to incorporate material from that source before or after the review? I'm happy to put this on hold and come back to it later if that would suit you better. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll do that now! Expect me to be done within two to three days. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @TechnoSquirrel69: The bytes may have decreased, but the word count sure hasn't! Right, I believe the article is ready for a review. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent, I'll be over in a couple of days with my comments! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: I'm getting around to this review slowly but steadily owing to some other things that are keeping me busy at the moment. However, could I ask you to send me exerpts of a couple sources I've not been able to get library access for? That'll help me do the number of verifiability checks that I like to do for a GAN review. The sources in question are Labelle 2021, pp. 53–63, and Littlefield Jr. & Parins 2011, pp. 273–274. Let me know whether or not that'll be possible, and you can reach me over email or Discord, whichever you're more comfortable with. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Should be sent through Discord. Take your time, and let me know if you need anything else! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 21:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @TechnoSquirrel69: The bytes may have decreased, but the word count sure hasn't! Right, I believe the article is ready for a review. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll do that now! Expect me to be done within two to three days. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Received! Review is on its way. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: That sounds great! Would you prefer to incorporate material from that source before or after the review? I'm happy to put this on hold and come back to it later if that would suit you better. Let me know either way! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)