Jump to content

Talk:Moules-frites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dubious origin

[edit]

The fact that mussels have been eaten in so much of the world, in places near water and the idea that potatoes were fried at some time, does not give any indication of the time or the place of the origin of moules-frites. Instead of arguing about whether it was Belgium of France "wot dunnit", why don't we put that it was a meal which became popular in north-eastern France and Belgium. As for the rest of the article - it's just waffle; correct me if I'm wrong. Francis Hannaway (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, feel free to add cited content. Personally I think the article doesn't do a bad job of introducing the history (not getting too bogged down in origin stuff) and taking about the dish's varients. The fact is that Moules-frites is considered a Belgian dish in continental Europe (see the academic book chapter cited) and this deserves some kind of treatment. Whatever the case, it can't be worse than Fish and chips... —Brigade Piron (talk) 11:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've cut out some of the waffle (no pun), while leaving a tip-of-the-hat to Belgium, and also generally edited and restructured the article for hopefully easier reading. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moules-frites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only 25 to 30 tonnes of moules?

[edit]

The article says "On average, between 25 and 30 tonnes of moules are consumed each year in Belgium as moules-frites." It gives a reference, but the link is broken.

Could someone please fact-check this? It seems an absurdly low figure.

One portion of moules-frites would normally include about 1 kg of moules, and one tonne is by definition 1,000 kg, so 25 to 30 tonnes of moules per year would mean only 25,000 to 30,000 portions of moules-frites per year. Given that Belgium has a population of about 11 million people, and that moules-frites is the national dish, you would expect a much higher figure than that.

In fact, Chez Leon, the famous moules-fries restaurant in the centre of Brussels, claims to serve 360 tonnes of moules per year (http://www.chezleon.be/en/everything-about-mussels/). That's just one restaurant, and their figure is over ten times Wikipedia's figure for the entire country! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.154.208.219 (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it is a very low figure, probably should be more like 25-30 thousand tonnes. I've marked the citation as dubious for now, and will try to find another source. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So far I've found this article, which claims that 60,000 tonnes is consumed in Belgium annually. I'm not sure if that qualifies as WP:RS, but it would seem to support the idea that there's a thousand missing from what the article states. Meanwhile, this report is probably more reliable, but it's a) out of date, and b) ambiguous about the total quantity (dithering about the live vs. shelled issue). DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]