A fact from Mount Rittmann appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that heat from the Mount Rittmann volcano in Antarctica allows mosses to grow?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
QPQ: - QPQ not done yet Overall: Article is large enough and new enough. The sources are academic journals and the abstract verifies the hook. The hook in itself is interesting although I feel like the grammar is off? Perhaps an alternative hook can be provided? In any case, all that's left is the QPQ and it should be good to go. Droodkin (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- QPQ not done yet
Article is large enough and new enough. The sources are academic journals and the abstract verifies the hook. The hook in itself is interesting although I feel like the grammar is off? Perhaps an alternative hook can be provided? In any case, all that's left is the QPQ and it should be good to go. Droodkin (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
