Talk:Mpra language
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mpra language was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: January 22, 2006. (Reviewed version). |
Mpra language removed from Wikipedia:Good articles
[edit]Mpra language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because too short see other language articles for appropiate length
- Yeah right, it's too short. Especially compared to other language articles. Too bad Mpre just poof went extinct, preventing this article from ever reaching 'appropriate length'. Oh the GA-gony... — mark ✎ 10:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not gonna claim that this or an article on just any topic can ever become a GA, but I rated some articles C class (and I think one even at B class) that were on similar cases, but discussed affiliations and available evidence in some more detail. For the time being, I'll rate this as Start class (and not Stub) because of the rarity of information. G Purevdorj (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)