This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The contents of the Mt. Baker Sesh Up page were merged into Mt. Baker Ski Area on 24 November 2015 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
This is looking pretty good. I think that looking for references in reliable sources would be a useful step. The references you have are good but they might not establish notability in terms of Wikipedia's policies. —mako๛23:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I'll have to disagree with this assesment. The given sources, without exception, look like blogs or user-submitted content with very little, if any, editorial oversight - thus they're likely not reliable and of very little use to a Wikipedia article. The only one that may come close to meeting the requirements is Frequency, but their "What up" section looks rather bloggy to me, too. Huon (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I really don't think we're in disagreement Huon about the substantive problems with the article or its state at this time. I also feel there are problems with the references and the issue with notability. If my tone came off as overly positive and optimistic, it's because I'm trying to be encouraging to the newbie. I think this article can be good although it will clearly require more work before it meets the encyclopedia's standards. Part of this might just because I know SleeepyD in person so its easy for me to assume good faith. —mako๛19:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A few more independent sources would indeed be very nice. To my opinion the claim for notability can use some help. The quick Google Test only shows 18.4k hits, boiling down to just 24 unique hits.
