The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
A fact from Muhammad Najati Sidqi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a Palestinian, Muhammad Najati Sidqi, wrote a book in 1940 arguing that Nazism was incompatible with Islam?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Problems with this article, rated as 'start class' when it was completed[edit]
The article is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources.
Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.
Query. Who's the dumbcluck who wrote that any start class article requires improvement in 'jargon use'?Nishidani (talk) 21:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it means that the use of jargon should be reduced? MPS1992 (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The qualty and importance scales could really use some work... I think the example articles may have been edited and no longer fit their supposed categories. But when it comes to "Start", isn't it pretty much anything better than a stub that could still use major work? TrickyH (talk) 21:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, mate, well, you've an uneasy patch to hoe, because the details on the pages re, at least, start articles are not very cogent, or scientific. Evidently neglect, and someone up in the higher echelons should try to get them organized with more formal criteria listed. As to major work in the offing, these are minor articles, about little known realities, which are underreported, or have a restricted interest for those who write the sources we use. I think it's wrong to rate an article as 'start' class, if it has more or less exhausted the available sources. Yesterday, I happened to mention Elhanan son of Jair when someone touched on the topic of giants in mythology, and mentioned Goliath, and gave a talk about him which bored people from dessert to coffee probably, but put me in the mood for a post-prandial snooze having exhausted the topic. I then looked up to see how wiki handled it. Sparse. There's fuck all really to say about him. You could expand it with about 8 or 9 sources regarding whether the Goliath he killed was the original Goliath, and the Goliath David killed the same bloke, only that the David story is a pure invention expanding on Elhanan's kill. But a paragraph on that, and you run out of things to say. So if anyone wrote it up, it would never get beyond 2 paragraphs - and would be complete, and comprehensive, and, if done neatly, would be GA, despite its diminutive length.Nishidani (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would you be able to nominate such an article for the process whereby it is declared a Good Article? I have never done it so I do not know much about it. MPS1992 (talk) 22:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I could, I guess, but never would do it. Any process outside of actually writing articles is, I find, tiresome, though sometimes necessary (arbitration etc.) My principle is to keep GA standards in mind while writing those articles where conditions allow one to work in relative peace. Once I've exhausted my sources, that's it. Having the stamp of approval's nice, but it's a bit like life generally. To use an analogy: the sturdier the 'ethical' code one might live by, the less one would need to find reassurances from other people. Seeking reassurance, or recognition is a sign, as often as not, at least in adults, of insecurity. It's nicer, picking up a lost wallet in the street, not to leave your name or address at the police-station when you drop it in. If you can be traced, things get embarrassing for all concerned.Nishidani (talk) 22:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
