Talk:Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khalji/Archive 1

Archive 1

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

bias

this page is heavily biased and historically inaccurate. Furthermore no sources are used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.69.2.5 (talk) 12:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree that this article is deeply flawed. The destruciton of Nalanda University was one of the greatest disasters and attrocities in the history of Buddhism, and certainly should not be described as a credit to his reputation. Santi Bhikkhu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.54.109 (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I was very supprised to read that killing people in most violent way is record and one of the greatest. This person committed what we would call today 'war crimes' using specialised military units to torture and mass-murder civilians. What is the difference in glorifing him and Hitler or Stalin? Radek, Kent, UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obywatel108 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Islamization of Bengal & the Historic Importance of Khilji

You like it or not the conquest of Bengal by this muslim soldier paved the way of turning the biggest delta of Indian subcontinent to the domain of Islam. Islamization of Bengal was no doubt initiated by Bakhtyar Khilji. So, there rests the historical importance of Khilji.Al-minar (talk) 07:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 08:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Why is he not Persian?

All famous Turkic people who lived in todays Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Iran, Central Asia are considered as pure Persian by Persian nationalists and they claim that they have nothing to do with Turkicness, Turkishness. Why is Bakhtiyar Khilji not considered as a Persian? Has it something to do with the negative image he has?

Now I understand the logic of Persian nationalism:

When a Turk (Turkic) is famous for positive things, he IS... PERSIAN!

When a Turk (Turkic) is famous for negative things he is Turkic (or Turk). —Preceding unsigned comment added by DragonTiger23 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

There are repeated events of vandalism on this article. So I request Wikipedia admins to mark this article as semi-protected so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it. - altaf 00:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md.altaf.rahman (talk • contribs)