Talk:Mungo Man

A fact from Mungo Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the remains of Mungo Man are the oldest anatomically modern human remains found in Australia?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/September.

Wikipedia

Australia: New South Wales / Indigenous peoples Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Mungo Man is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject New South Wales.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Homo erectus

I heard somewhere (i'll try to find the source) that mungo man is much too anatomically different from any humans too be classified as such, and that there was evidence he may have been homo erectus. try to go into more detail about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.94.55 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 4 November 2006

A minor but helpful edit would be simply to spell out, define, or otherwise clarify the abbreviation, "ka", for those, like me, who are unfamiliar with it, as it is used twice in the following sentence. "Since remains of a robust form of modern humans have been found in Ethiopia dating to about 160 ka, and similar remains have been dated at Jebel Qafzeh in Israel at about 100 ka, it is conceivable that Mungo Man's maternal ancestor left Africa in an early wave." 72.64.13.109 (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Shouldn't Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) apply with regard to Mungo Man vs Mungo Lake remains. Also isn't it appropriate to use the move tool, rather than a redirect to maintain article history. Wapondaponda (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]