Talk:MySims Agents

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Yikes

This page needs A LOT of work. I can stress A LOT enough.--Krazycev 13 ^{other crap} 22:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So... Why don't you try and help instead of just complaining about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.1.45 (talk) 01:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Want to help

I can see this page needs ALOT of work. I want to help make the page better. I have played the game (twice) and know a lot about it, but if I were to add anything, how would I site it? Could somebody please help... or let me know how I can?

This is not an Advertisment

This article is written like an advertisment in a magazine for the said game, not a Wikipedia article.76.93.187.141 (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article split

SPLIT

There is a weak consensus to split the article. While there are concerns by opposers that there might not be enough source for a standalone article, the nominator had provide some sources that should pass WP:GNG that remain unopposed. Lulusword (talk) 15:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It's clear the DS version has different story, etc., and it has enough reviews for a standalone article. I would suggest the portable version be split to its own article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support: While the independent notability of the Nintendo DS version feels rather flimsy from the scant amount of sources relating to it, I acknowledge that its differences from the Wii version are enough to justify a split. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: While the content of the games may be different, I don't think there is enough content to justify a split. OceanHok (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Regardless of the different storylines, the DS version hasn't received enough coverage to get its own page. Sebbirrrr (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebbirrrr: That is entirely and unequivocally false. You may want to entirely reconsider your statement. The NDS version got reviews from Games Master UK, Nintendo Gamer, and IGN, in addition to GamingXP and JeuxVideo, more than enough to pass GNG and to provide enough content for a standalone article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Zxcvbnm: Thank you for your reply. Fair enough, but my concern is that the development and release section concerns both versions rather than each separately. Also, you could have said that the game received enough reviews to justify a split instead of replying with hostility to what I said... Sebbirrrr (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.