Talk:MyTouch

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Merge

Do all of the individual phones under this brand really need their own pages? Even if they aren't all merged into this page, it appears that there's little to distinguish one of these phone models from another without being rather redundant. §everal⇒|Times 22:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Well, they are important aren't they? I don't think you nor I would be looking them up if they weren't.[reply]

Apparently, the phones do all need their own article. Plus, merging all of them here will make this page too long.Greg Heffley 22:55, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently? If the need was apparent I wouldn't think it would be questionable. If there's some kind of unspoken guideline regarding how articles about phones are handled I'm sure not aware of it. §everal⇒|Times 00:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course individual versions/iterations need their own pages. They are different hardware, different products, different designs, different devices. Would you merge all the Droids into 1 single article? Would you merge all the iPhones, iPods into 1 single article with all their respective descriptions? (Note: the two articles, iPhone and iPod, are actually what this article should be - a general overview of the whole product line, but not a merge of all the different products.) - M0rphzone (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations section

We need to paraphrase the quotations section into the product description or remove it altogether since it is outdated. - M0rphzone (talk) 21:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MyTouch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713005835/http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/ to http://mytouch.t-mobile.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]