Talk:My Brilliant Friend

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rationale for "C" class

Here is the rationale for this assessment:

Strengths: The text emphasizes a comprehensive plot summary, a clear structure with well-defined sections, and critical reception from credible sources such as Book Marks, The Guardian, and The New York Times.

Weaknesses: The article needs more depth in reception, more in-depth exploration of themes and motifs, or detailed critical analysis. The plot and main characters sections are missing citations, which need more citations to primary or secondary sources for verifiability. The article also lacks sufficient author information and could benefit from more historical and cultural context, especially regarding the depiction of 1950s Naples, class issues, and gender roles. Bookleo (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for "B-class"

Here’s the rationale:

Strengths:

The article provides a comprehensive coverage of the book, including detailed summaries of the plot, background, and themes and information on its cultural and critical reception and adaptations. The structure is well-organized with clear sections, making it easy for readers to navigate. Additionally, the book contains citations from reliable sources, enhancing its credibility.

Areas for Improvement:

- The article needs more inline citations, especially in the Plot and Themes sections, to improve verifiability.

- A more thorough critical analysis, incorporating scholarly interpretations, would enhance the article, particularly in discussing themes.

- The lead section should offer a more comprehensive overview of the novel's impact or significance. Bookleo (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]