Talk:My Favorite Thing Is Monsters

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources[edit]

Volume 1:

Reviews: The New Yorker, NPR, AV Club, The Comics Journal, New York Times, Forbes, Chicago Tribune, Chicago Tribune (2), Publishers Weekly (1), Publishers Weekly (2), New Statesman, Hyperallergic, Art Spiegelman mention
Best of 2017 lists: NYT, Publisher Weekly, CBR, AV Club, TCJ, Vulture
Interviews: NPR (transcript), American Libraries, Boing Boing, Eisner discussion
Small Press Expo panel, Publishers Weekly retailers interview, scroll.in, TCJ
Reddit list
Best American Comics 2018

Opencooper (talk) 19:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 2:

Reviews: PW
Publication: Vulture, Forbes, Lawsuit
Interviews: LJ

Opencooper (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox suitability[edit]

Hello @Stoshmaster:, thanks for your contribution to this article. However, I'm not sure if an infobox is really appropriate for this article. For starters, the graphic novel is in two volumes, so the "Date", "Page count", and "ISBN" labels wouldn't be applicable. Additionally, the "Creator" and "Publisher" labels are both stated upfront in the lead, so this information would be redundant. Lastly, all that leaves is "Main characters", which I don't feel is appropriate as none of the characters are notable in their own right, and who is primary can be debatable, as the characters of Sandy and Franklin also play prominent roles. As before, the lead states who the protagonist is. Note I'm not not trying to be anti-infobox as a knee-jerk reaction, as I feel they have utility in certain kinds of articles, but it doesn't seem like a good fit for this one. Opencooper (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]