Jump to content

Talk:My Man (Jade Ewen song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC) Hi again! I'll be reviewing this song. As it is pretty short, and the quality of the contributors is of great excellence, i'm confident i wont need more than 2 days to review this. --Hahc21 (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Till I Go Home (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1

[edit]

I've fixed some minor issues on the article. I'll be checking the references by Sunday. --Hahc21 (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2

[edit]

Again, i've read the article and fixed minor issues.

Composition
  • ""My Man" is a contemporary R&B song that also incorporates dance-pop elements."
  • And the reference?
Is at end of the next sentence I believe. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mmmm, the problem was that the link provided didn't covered the entire interview. On the entire interview, the "Sassy club banger" and cont. R&B statements are covered. I changed the link. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 14:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References

Ok, the references are all OK. I have little doubts about two or three of the sources, but they all seem to be reliable.

--Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 03:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

[edit]

Ok. I've read the article a dozen times and i don't find any other issues to be resolved by now.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Final comments: Another good job by Till I Go Home. Minor issues always appear, and as of now i think they're all well solved. Of course, i recommend to add an image on the composition section if possible, but it's just a comment!. Thanks. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 03:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.