This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
Hello all. I had previously edited this page and those of 8 similar series by putting the book information into sortable tables. I think a table format makes it much easier to parse out all the information (main character, location, date, author) rather than having it in one long line. Making it sortable also makes it easier for users if someone wanted to have the list in chronological order (in-story), read ones that take place in a certain location, or read ones by a certain author. The only page still in table format is Mon Histoire if you would like to look at it for an example. I was just wondering what the reasoning was for undoing all the tables since I believe they make the information more accessible.
Also, what was the reason for removing many other diary-style historical fiction series from the See Also section?
I hope I don't sound petulant that my edits were undone; though I spent a lot of time making the edits, I did it all because I thought it would make things easier to use. I just want to understand the reasoning for going back to the old format.
Tay (talk) 01:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a number of citations to reliable sources and now feel the maintenance template ("This article does not cite any sources") could be removed. --Pippipip (talk) 02:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]