Talk:NAT Port Mapping Protocol
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Reads like an Apple fan boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.230.125 (talk) 14:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Comparison witht UPnP needed
[edit]What is the difference between this and UPnP? 61.2.48.219 (talk) 08:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- As I understand it, UPnP is poorly thought through, and fundamentally insecure. Since Apple prefers reinventing the wheel to promoting interoperability, it introduced NAT-PMP to effectively replace UPnP in its AirPort router and MacOS computers. — voidxor 23:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- See the Port Control Protocol article which covers the question
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles
- Mid-importance Computer networking articles
- Stub-Class Computer networking articles of Mid-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Mid-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles