Talk:NETFILE

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This is a list of all the options available for netfile in 2006 (2005 tax returns). CRA netfile software is approved yearly by the Government of Canada and that information can be seen on their own web site (which is linked).

Everything I wrote is factual and complete... is there a way to modify the text to make it acceptable? Is it the fact that I listed the price of each of the products that causes the problem? If yes, I can simply delete that column if that will suffice (although those listed are correct).

This post also compliments exitings text on Wikipedia found here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFILE

Reverting recent edits[edit]

I have reverted the addition of some disadvantages and asked that a source be provided per Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Saying that it is "common sense" is not a justification for ignoring those pillar of Wikipedia. And the presence of other unified material is never a justification for adding more invited material. Ground Zero | t 10:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]