Jump to content

Talk:Norske Tog Class 93/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Specific comments

  • Need to explain what a "bogie" is in the second paragraph of Specifications.
  • I"ve accepted the non-English sources on good faith.
The one explanation needed is not enough to hold this back from GA, so I'll be passing this now. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have linked to bogie, and put in a short explanation. Arsenikk (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]