Talk:Norske Tog Class 93/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Specific comments
- Need to explain what a "bogie" is in the second paragraph of Specifications.
- I"ve accepted the non-English sources on good faith.
- The one explanation needed is not enough to hold this back from GA, so I'll be passing this now. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have linked to bogie, and put in a short explanation. Arsenikk (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)