Talk:NSB El 18/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- ... and the cabs are pressure tight. What does this mean?
- Explained Arsenikk (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- ... and that NSB could expect "a racket" Would "dispute" be a better word than "racket"?
- It is a bit difficult to translate this. The term "skikkelig bråk" could be translated to "dispute", but it implies much more than that; these are rather angry unionists who were a bit pissed off. Dispute seems a bit soft, but then again it may be more accurate than racket. Anyhow, there seems to be no optimal translation here. I'll change it though. Arsenikk (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fixes. Dispute is a better word in English. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- It is a bit difficult to translate this. The term "skikkelig bråk" could be translated to "dispute", but it implies much more than that; these are rather angry unionists who were a bit pissed off. Dispute seems a bit soft, but then again it may be more accurate than racket. Anyhow, there seems to be no optimal translation here. I'll change it though. Arsenikk (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- ... and the cabs are pressure tight. What does this mean?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References appear to check out.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Sufficient detail without trivia.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Licensed, captioned and tagged.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thanks for the very fast review. Arsenikk (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's a pleasure, I am now happy to pass this. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)