Talk:Name It and Frame It?

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

The list of degree mills[edit]

The list of degree mills has value as the list of List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning has good and bad. This has the ones the author believes is bad, and has ones not on that list. I see no need for its removal.PatriotBible 23:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do multiple lists on the same topic. Merge any missing schools to List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning, but wikipedia is not a free web host for Levicoff's list from 1993. --JJay 23:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you equate the wikipedia list link with Levicoff's list? PatriotBible 23:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Levicoff could potentially be a source for the wikipedia list. That being said, we can not recreate his list here for copyvio reasons among the others already mentioned. If he has published it somewhere on the internet then link to it. --JJay 00:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that your issue a copyright violation? PatriotBible 00:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all spelled out above. What do you not understand? --JJay 00:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That "list" does not exist in the book. Rather on pages 109-148 he describes each "degree mill school" in alphabetical order. I typed the list as it is each school mentioned in the chapter, all of which he considers mills. Hence, it is not a copyright issue, but a verifiable wikipedia description of the schools he analysized and deemed "mills". Go to your local library and see for yourself.

I included the list as it is helpful for people to see which places have been called degree mills. The wikipedia list of unaccredited places is not the samething. I am rather disappointed I spent the time typing it to warn people only to have it removed.

What exactly is different about the wikipedia list? It seems clearly to be the identical topic. I can't see any point in having two lists (and what's worse of mostly red links), nor do I understand why we should do a separate list just for this self-published book. Add the schools to the wikipedia list and footnote it to Levicoff. --JJay 03:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So its not a copyright violation. We are left with your belief that a list made by wikipedia users for unaccredited schools, both good and bad, is no different than a list made from a book that discusses degree mills.

What do you not understand? Why are you doing this? You clearly have a history of trying to remove these helpful lists and here, as stated with that link, you wanted to keep a list of schools that was a copyright violation. What are doing? Why the hypocrisy? PatriotBible 08:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To JJay, who has been adding the merge note. This is a list compiled by the author and is what the book is about. Stop reverting without discussion. No one wants it off the page. FGT2 19:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Name It and Frame It?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130403065121/http://chea.org/pdf/degree_mills_effective_practice.pdf to http://www.chea.org/pdf/degree_mills_effective_practice.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]