Jump to content

Talk:Nanna's Cottage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Seems a bit biased in favor of the show doesn't it?--Acebrock 00:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nanna'sCottagePoster.jpg

[edit]

Image:Nanna'sCottagePoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Walkers

[edit]

Carly Walker has been in several shows including: Oliver as Oliver, Suessical The Musical as a choir member, Les Miserable as Little Cosset and a Street Urchin etc etc etc............ Cameron Walker has been in Les Miserable as Thenardeia, Crucible as a Guard etc etc etc... Their parents work for KVAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.246.149 (talk) 03:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources & WP:DUE

[edit]

The sources added, both in the EL section, and on the AfD, to support the topic's notability, deal with aspects such as:

I would suggest that if these sources (and similar) are genuinely given as the basis for the article (not merely as a bait-and-switch), that the article must give them WP:DUE weight, and provide a preponderance on the topics they cover, not the unsourced, largely IMDB-spam (lengthy episode lists, cast-lists & OR descriptions of characters) that is the current 'bread and butter' of this article. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]