Talk:Nanson's method

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Use of Nanson's method

The website of the University of Adelaide says that its council is elected by proportional representation by the single transferable vote [1]. Markus Schulze 13:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to [2] the University of Melbourne abolished Nanson's method in 1983 and the Anglican diocese of Melbourne also abandoned it. Iota 22:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baldwin violates reversal symmetry

See this mail. Markus Schulze 11:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Preference with the smallest majority"

If a Condorcet winner exists, they will be elected. If not, (there is a Condorcet cycle) then the preference with the smallest majority will be eliminated.

What's meant by "preference with the smallest majority?" This sounds a lot like a description of ranked pairs, except RP only drops preferences with the smallest majority that create a cycle. But I doubt that's what's meant by "dropping the smallest majority." Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]