Jump to content

Talk:Nashik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Need more info and cleanup

[edit]

History of Nashik: The article itself and the summary here. The description is more mythological than historical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnandKatgaonkar (talkcontribs) 04:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History Mariji343 (talk) 06:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need Information

[edit]

While article in Marathi language mr:गोदावरी नदी about en:Godavari River is developing we seek co-operation for more information related to

  • Tributories coming from Karnatak,andhra,orisa,
  • Erigation Projects on Godavari and Tributories
  • Urban Settelements/Cities located on bank of Godavari
  • Flood controll lines on Godavari for various cities
  • Industries and industrial pollution on Godavari
  • Translation from Marathi to English article also is welcome

-विजय 11:07, 18 ऑगस्ट 2006 (UTC)

Structural revisions

[edit]

I have attempted to give a definite structure to the Nashik article and hope that now it can expand within the set framework. There is a need to create separate articles for subjects which are consuming undue space e.g. Nashik: Mythological references. The long lists of 'things' definitely need a second look e.g. Areas of Nashik. Such articles are seen and read by any and everybody around the world and it is important that correct and precise information be given! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnandKatgaonkar (talkcontribs) 11:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. More such sections are getting added one namely revolutionary activities. @AnandKatgaonkar 122.170.118.188 (talk) 04:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My reversions

[edit]

My reversions are due to the facts that:

  • it should be postal code, not postal_code
  • there are some redundant linebreaks
  • use bullets, not manual linebreaks, to create lists
  • the "Local News of Nashik" section reads like an advertisement. See WP:ADVERT.
  • "km" is spelled with lowercase letters, not "Km"
  • the "Travel to Nashik" does not only read like an advertisement (see WP:ADVERT), it's also generally unencyclopedic. It should be written on Wikitravel instead.
  • the external links are redundant. See WP:LINKS.

As thus, I will keep reverting it. If you disagree; I suggest you explain why on this talk page, or consider requiring a Wikipedia:Third Opinion. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 16:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Jobjörn don't force your personal opinion on Nashik community. Links of 'Local News of Nashik' are informative to related people of Nashik City. If you are disagree with this leave it as it is. This is not your personal page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.7.238 (talkcontribs).
Uh. Did you even read what I wrote? I'm taking in some other editors. By the way, I am not from Nashik, I am from Visby. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 11:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the article again, removing:

Thank you, and I hope you'll discuss here before re-reverting the article. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Photo

[edit]

First photo ( downtown photo) is incorrect. It is not-even fom India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.239.150.105 (talk) 11:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC) even if you click on photo it is titled as Almaty.jpg,[reply]

Nasik city article

[edit]

Nasik city article is by no means related to the Hindu portal. If so then kindly throw light on the matter. Its absurd to relate a city to a religion portal. Nefirious (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nasik is fourth largest city in maharashtra after Mumbai, Pune and Nagpur, and not third as mentioned in introductory para. Wikipedia in its article List of most populous cities in India has ranked Nagpur as 13th largest in india and Nashik as 24th. Mandar hi (talk) 10:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changes were made as per comment above but someone seems to have again changed it. Nasik is fourth largest city in maharashtra after Mumbai, Pune and Nagpur, and not third as mentioned in introductory para. Wikipedia in its article List of most populous cities in India has ranked Nagpur as 13th largest in india and Nashik as 24th. Mandar hi (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name of NMC commissioner. JaidattaD (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bagulabhay (talk) 12:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moghul empire

[edit]

According article Nasik was in hands of Moghul Empire fom 1487 to 1818. I want to know how the Moghul Empire, stablished in 1526, can take the power in a city 40 years before?. I change the date according Imperial Gazeteeer, to 1636. The end of moghul rule was 1760, also according sama source. --88.19.49.50 (talk) 20:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There are too many red links in the article. --Extra999 (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the article is messed up. Two to three sections like Multiplexes, Cityscape are unneccessary. The article requires lot of cleaning to match other city articles of India. WorLD8115(TalK) 18:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Cityscape

Let us look at articles such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City In my opinion the very structure is common for all cities which is Background, Index, Geography, Cityscape, Culture, Economy, Demography, Government, Education, Transportation need not be challenged as all these are essential ingredients which form the image of the city and more than that it is a fairly established format of many better articles.

As for multiplexes they could be quick list under culture inside entertainment. Also one must understand that significance of such things is with local pier reference i.e. a 7 screen cinema might be insignificant for a Newyork but it tends to become encyclopedic for a emerging city might Nashik. Let us debate such things. AnandKatgaonkar (talk) 05:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnandKatgaonkar (talkcontribs) 05:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Biggest Marketplace?

[edit]

In history section, it is mentioned that "Nashik in 150 BC was believed to be the country's largest marketplace". This is very doubtful, unverifiable. The source sited also contains many unhistorical statements. Neither gives any source for this 'biggest marketplace' claim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaundeshwari (talkcontribs) 07:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Niraj Kulkarni hoax

[edit]

Hi folks,

This is a quick heads up. I've recently been trying to deal with somebody repeatedly adding references to a video game developer named Niraj Kulkarni, hailing from Nashik, with a 'claim to fame' being award winning design work on Crysis. Unfortunately, this AfD found that nobody by this name ever worked on Crysis or is even a recognised game designer, making this most likely a case of a self-promotional hoax. I've been playing a protracted game of whack-a-mole against somebody who keeps readding it (most recently Chimanya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)), but it sometimes slips through the net, so more eyes on the lookout will definitely help keep this problem under control.

Cheers, CaptainVindaloo t c e 16:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.indovacations.net/english/Nasik_about.htm (see archived version, which proves they had it first); other sources have also been copied. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nashiknightview.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Nashiknightview.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nashiknightview.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too much Original Research

[edit]

I am removing some material. Hopefully we'll get this suitable for Wikipedia standard. Sandy13991 (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit temp 11 April 2013

[edit]

I have added a copyedit temp as much needs to be done to make this article encyclopedic in tone, grammar and style. If this is not done before May, the Guild of Copyeditors' May Drive could pick-up on it. Much of the problem with this page comes from unreliable and unreferenced additions from IP addresses. Acabashi (talk). 11 April 2013

Directory-like listings

[edit]

This article as it currently stands has issues with the numerous sections that are nothing but tables with endless lists of institutions/organisations that are unsourced and less informative than information anyone can easily find out on the Internet. Wikipedia is not a directory and I will prune these sections as well as the empty ones. May I suggest that editors wishing to expand does that in well sourced prose and in their sandboxes before adding to the article. Thanks. -- Sam Sing! 12:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Education

[edit]

K.K. Wagh Institute of Engineering Education & Research, Nashik (KKWIEER) is the oldest engineering college in Nashik.

It is a self-financed, privately managed college recognized by AICTE, adjudged in “A” grade by the Govt. of Maharashtra and affiliated to Pune University.[citation needed] K. K. Wagh Institute of Engineering Education & Research was established in 1984 and is located at Hirabai Haridas Vidyanagari in scenic environment surrounded by lush green trees. The college is spread over area of 10 hectares and offers Bachelor degree programmes in Electrical, Electronics & Telecommunication, Mechanical, Production, Computer, Civil, Chemical Engineering & Information Technology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiragvlunkad (talkcontribs) 13:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: multiple sources, all copy vios stemming from 30 June 2015 onwards. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 18:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC) —SpacemanSpiff 18:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all

[edit]

Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a local bulletin board or a tourist brochure, or an indiscriminate collection of information. So we do not include everything there is to know about Nashik, just like we don't include everything there is to know about other cities around the world, only vital facts and major points of interest, things that are of interest also to readers in other parts of India, or other countries. I have already cleaned out lists of shops, hotels and schools, and intend to also clean out the section about every conceivable kind of food that is eaten in Nashik, because trivial information like that does not belong in an encyclopaedia. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 20:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomas.W:See here for some background information, I'm a bit strapped for on-wiki time for the next couple of days. I tried to centralize the multiple convos over there, but there are others. I'd also asked MRG and Abecedare to keep a watch over here. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 03:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nashik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:35, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nashik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ayurveda

[edit]

Need t Ayurvedaspace (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoin to main article

[edit]

Strongly suggest that this article and the Nashik history article be rejoined. I was recently interested in finding out about Nashik and the split was awkward and disjointed. I don't think that the history of a location is divorced from any other data about a location. CPES (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nashik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mi

[edit]

Mi Mariji343 (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nashik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Nashik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to highlight the right authorities in the Industry section

[edit]

Hello People,

As this is the official Nashik page, we are missing references for the right authorities for the industry section. Like for Manufacturing, NIMA, AIMA is not referenced . For IT , NITA is not referenced and linked. We should add these and link them so that people can approach the right authorities for their sectors.

Shashankw5 (talk) 06:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We also have broken links for acress and icomet in this section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashankw5 (talkcontribs) 06:51, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Official page? It is a Wikipedia page only. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2019

[edit]

In the first paragraph Replace third largest city by fourth largest city in Maharashtra after Mumai Pune and Nagpur. Akshay021155 (talk) 07:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NiciVampireHeart 13:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2019

[edit]

Altitude of Nashik is incorrect. Nashik city has altitude of 700m . Not 986m. Please correct it. You cannot consider altitude of mountain peaks for an article about city Ricksanchez97 (talk) 02:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2020

[edit]

change altitute from 966 metres to 566 metres. 49.207.57.27 (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2020

[edit]

please change the mayor`s name as the mayor has changed. Viren07 (talk) 16:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - QuadColour (talk) 22:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2020

[edit]

The metro rank of nashik is 29 but here it mentioned 10 Adhage15 (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Rummskartoffel (talk) 17:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Title spelling errors

[edit]

Hi Trappist the monk, do you believe there is a consensus to make corrections to cite titles which contain spelling errors? I have interpreted MOS:PMC as referring to article text (this is in reference to your edit here where you modified my edit which had placed a [sic] tag on a cite title error). If there is general agreement that titles may be corrected then it should be explicitly documented to prevent confusion. Neils51 (talk) 09:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Trappist the monk:

Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2023

[edit]
106.66.28.110 (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“Nashik is the sixth largest city in Maharashtra after Pimpri-Chinchwad” should be replaced by “Nashik is the third largest city in Maharashtra.” 223.233.82.226 (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nashik is the third largest city of Maharashtra as per as governments official website. Here is the proof

  1. https://nashik.gov.in/about-district/#:~:text=Geography,temperature%20variation%2C%20particularly%20in%20winters.
  2. https://www.ndtv.com/video/property/the-property-show/nashik-real-estate-what-maharashtra-s-third-largest-city-has-to-offer-244669
  3. https://www.mtdc.co.in/nashik/
  4. https://southasia.iclei.org/news/brand-new-addition-to-the-iclei-congregation-nashik-india/
  5. https://www.maharashtratourism.gov.in/-/nashik-city
 Not done Only one of those sources says "3rd largest," and that doesn't have a date associated with it. In any case, the article should align with the figures in List_of_cities_in_Maharashtra. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023

[edit]

Curtail the destinations for flights from Nasik. As most of those are not operating anymore. Based on Skyscanner and flightsradar24 websites currently only flights from Nasik (ISK/VAOZ) stated are Hyderabad, Nagpur, Ahmedabad, Goa, Indore and Delhi. Some more destinations are starting in October 2023 as per a news article.Ehteshaamkazi (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2023

[edit]

Please add MH-51 in the Vehicle Registration section Sagarmankar08 (talk) 04:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]