Talk:Nashik Municipal Corporation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nashik Municipal Corporation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

File:Nashiknightview.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nashiknightview.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nashiknightview.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

BJP Photo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information

Hello Number 57 Sir, TerminatorMan2712 has added wrong information back. Check the Source once for information [1] Cinzia007 (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinzia007: That source is the 2017 election results, whereas what is in the infobox should be the current seat distribution (which may well have changed due to defections, by-elections etc). However, based on this source, which TerminatorMan2712 used, that seat distribution is still correct.

However, I think this may be a competence issue by TerminatorMan2712, because while the url they used for the source goes to the article that has a 66/35/6/6/5 breakdown, the title of the source given in the citation does not match the source – I think they may have meant to link to another website, which possibly shows different figures.

In the meantime, I have restored the figures referenced in the source that was linked to. Cheers, Number 5 7 17:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, 5 people have left the party.[2] now it doesn't make any sense. These people's tenure has remained just 12 days in completion Cinzia007 (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]