Talk:Nasik Caves

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Article needs a ramp up

The Gazetter published by Bombay presidency Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |pagenum= ignored (help) has lots of indepth information on this monument and can prove as a valuable/reliable resource for this article. --Kedar (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pandavleni Caves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090107034705/http://www.yotreks.com/Sahyadri/Caves/Pandavleni.html to http://www.yotreks.com/Sahyadri/Caves/Pandavleni.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of the article

It seems these caves are most generally called "Nasik Caves" (752 hits on Google Books "Nasik+Caves"), whether the other namings are much more marginal: 49 hits for Pandavleni "Pandavleni+Caves", 9 hits for "Nashik Caves" "Nashik+caves", 66 hits for "Pandulena caves" "Pandulena+caves", and 1 hit for Trirashmi Leni "Trirashmi+Leni" which currently comes on top in the article header. I therefore suggest we modify the article name according to, by far, its most current naming in the literature: "Nasik Caves", with the usual, "also called Pandavleni, Pandulena, Trirashmi" etc... in the header. Opinions welcome. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 04:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong name as Jaina Caves

It is very wrongly, intentionally and mischievously mentioned that the place is holy Jaina place. Also it is mischievously mentioned that caves are Jaina Caves. The face is that all these caves are Buddhist Caves. The Jaina reference must be removed. 2405:201:1F:F164:700D:69A0:78C6:7592 (talk) 13:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Nasik inscription of Ushavadata into Nasik Caves

The content of Nasik inscription article is based on a single source. Should be merged, as this is a content fork. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]