Talk:National Cleavage Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Really Stupid[edit]

This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. The picture is just a woman (I assume) trying her hardest to make her lack of assets look like she actually has any. Notice how hard she is pressing them together with her arms. No one is going to sit like that comfortably so it's incredibly obvious that without this stance, she has nothing up top. This is manufactured cleavage and in an article about National Cleavage Day, it's a pretty piss poor representation. Also, no where in that picture is any evidence that this was for National Cleavage Day. I'm outraged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.163.25 (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Link[edit]

The link to 'Breast Cancer Awareness on National Cleavage Day' is no longer relevant(spammy domain?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.73.150 (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Real?[edit]

I can't tell if this is real or not, but regardless, it seems pretty cool to me. PragmaticallyWyrd (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When?[edit]

What day is this event actually held? One would assume there is a specific date. Kingadrock (talk) 08:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yeah... a whole article about founding, protests and i don't know what but no information on the date whatsoever 93.184.73.10 (talk)

Twitter[edit]

In 2009, references to National Cleavage Day were so popular on Twitter that the term "National Cleavage" was briefly number one on the website's top ten trend list.

Is this relevant? Is this appropriate for an encyclopedia? No, I don't think so. If anybody feels the same, please remove it. --77.20.145.25 (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

Appropriate skin colour in this picture? Just a thought... —Preceding unsigned comment added by David n m bond (talkcontribs) 12:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What[edit]

This is ridiculous. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mid Importance? lol if this was an article titled "National Blue Watermelons Day" it could have just as many sources and it would be deleted. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Cleavage Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]