Talk:National Firearms Association

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Gun politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Gun politics task force.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

‎Ginger-NFA (talk · contribs) has been paid by National Firearms Association. Declaration

Controversies

The first two controversies do not have any source to backup their claims so I've put in citation requested. If some has citeable sources per Wikipedia guidleines, please add them. -TheDrew (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a link to the Moncton shooting and expanded on that section of this article with info from that page. I found zero info on the first controversy, claiming that the NRA funds/controls them. I've since deleted the following: "The NFA has been criticized for both being irrelevant in Canada, now that the Canadian long-gun registry has been revoked.[citation needed] It has also been criticized for being a puppet organization of the American National Rifle Association, from which the NFA gets a majority of its funding.[citation needed]"

A Canadian Toker (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This section was deleted entirely bit-by-bit. I've restored it. It's the only part of the article with 3rd-party sources. The referencing can be improved, but it's inappropriate to simply delete it outright.

At the same time, a huge section devoted to the NFA's actions has been added. That material looks like it might have been copied from their website or a press release. It needs references and probably a major re-write for NPOV. Felsic2 (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article ONLY details controversies.

As such, I've added the NPOV tags at the top. I shall get to work tomorrow making this page more neutral and less lop-sided in its extremely negative, biased state at this moment. TheEpicGhosty (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]