Talk:National Standards of the People's Republic of China

Merger proposal (2013)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The article ~~GB Standard~~ Automotive GB Standards should be merged into this one since it covers the same subject (although the specific standard numbers in that article are different from the ones in this article). BW95 (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The page is now at Automotive GB Standards. However, its table contains petty details compared to the subjects covered here, and probably should not be kept in Wikipedia because of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I suggest just merging the intro about CCC and the some or all of the external links, rather than full merger. – Fayenatic London 07:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now completed this merge, leaving out the table from http://www.china-certification.com/en/gb-standards on account of WP:NOTDIR. – Fayenatic London 12:33, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggested move (2013)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. As I said, it is illogical to have the category and the main article at different names. I'm not going to force Justin to go back to CfD to get the category changed (likely fruitlessly) and it seems apparent the proposed name wasn't invented from thin air. -- tariqabjotu 03:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GB standards → Guobiao_standards – Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_May_22#Category:Guobiao_standards --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 15:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - reluctantly, would really like to be able to support. "GB standards" is misleading and will lead most people to think "UK standards". Unfortunately cannot find sources to support. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps GB standards (China) and "GB standards" becomes a disambiguation page linking to all the various UK standards general articles and this article. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 03:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hatnote may cover it. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support If that's what the GB stands for, I have no problem supporting this. There is some serious potential for confusion, as IIO notes, and using the expanded name seems like a better solution to me. The proposed form is used in the first EL, so it's not like we'll be inventing it. --BDD (talk) 23:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As a Brit, I do not remember seeing/hearing "GB standards" being used when referring to "British standards". The individual standards are all prefixed "GB" so there is real significance in "GB standards" as opposed to "Guobiao standards". The hatnote pointed out by In ictu oculi suffices for disambiguation re British standards. – Fayenatic London 13:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is illogical and ridiculous to have the category and the primary article at different titles, so these either the category needs to be moved or the article needs to be moved. -- tariqabjotu 15:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guobiao standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130325110633/http://www.cqc.com.cn/english/aboutcqc/Statement/A022904index_1.htm to http://www.cqc.com.cn/english/aboutcqc/Statement/A022904index_1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changshu Ke Mei hang clothing Manufacturing co. Ltd

I bought two 10 pcs of these Disposable Face Masks / Non-medical / With Ear Loops yesterday -Fred Meyer finally had procedure masks in stock, the Chinese standard of which is GB/T32610 2016.

No idea how to scope out the equivalent standards, and the distributor, Pinnacle Brands, LLC just has three employees across all its locations, so they aren't of much help. Manufactured by Changshu Ke Mei hang clothing Manufacturing co. Ltd., Yanli Village, Mocheng, Yushan Town, Changshu. It does appear to be a reputable company. You don't just haul in melt blown fabric machinery and plug it it!

https://www.actopsmart.com/disposable-face-mask.html https://www.sesec.eu/app/uploads/2020/04/GB-T-32610-2016-Technical-specification-of-daily-protective-mask.pdf https://www.bizapedia.com/trademarks/hxihan-90094991.html kencf0618 (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]