Talk:National Underclassmen Combine
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Underclassmen Combine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nationalunderclassmen.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=23100&ATCLID=204982638&KEY=&DB_OEM_ID=23100&DB_LANG=C&IN_SUBSCRIBER_CONTENT= - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120530075811/http://www.nationalunderclassmen.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=23100&ATCLID=204976480 to http://www.nationalunderclassmen.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=23100&ATCLID=204976480
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Notable attendees
[edit]So, this list was quite bloated. I may be prejudiced here because this whole article reads like advertising, and a long list of pros who attended would likewise be clever advertising. I don't see the notability here - to me, an encyclopedia article about this recruiting service should only include attendees if they are, according to independent secondary sources, notable *for having attended this camp*. A list of notable people who happen to have attended is no more useful than listing every UPenn grad with a blue link.
I'd prefer to keep this section out entirely. But if someone can make a case for a few people being notable *because* they attended, I'm all ears! Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)