Jump to content

Talk:Natural resources of India/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssriram mt (talk · contribs) 23:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA comments

[edit]

I had a detailed look at the article and also the preceding failed GA. I feel the nomination is effected before incorporating comments from the previous review. There are lot of single sentences, a couple of sections without any reference (fishing and forestry) and quite some missing details (like quantity/quality produced) across sections. The prose is also not consistent across different sections of the article. Given the importance of the article and the amount of detail that is needed, I suggest going with a peer review before further nomination. Also referencing can be serialized - page numbers, access date and other prime parameters are missing, which would make it difficult to verify.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. The map of India shown is a disputed map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.210.79.192 (talk) 08:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: