Talk:Nectar guide
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Move text and swap redirections
[edit]For historical reasons there are three articles, Nectar guide, Pollen Guide, and Floral guide. The latter two are redirs to the Nectar guide. This is fairly harmless, but slightly irksome and likely to be a nuisance in future, as all these are in fact floral guides, which makes it the logical site for the discussion of all three (plus any future theme that anyone dreams up). I propose moving the text to floral guide and changing nectar guide to a redir. Fortunately there are as yet no sections apart from refs and external links. It would be well to make the move before the "stub" is expanded to include substantial sections. I would of course change the redirs accordingly. Any comments? Objections? JonRichfield (talk) 07:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Nectar guide is the predominant term. If you want quantitative evidence of this Web of Knowledge returns 18 articles that use nectar+guide in the title, whereas floral+guide returns 10 of which 2 are off-topic. Pollen guide returns 24 occurrences of pollen+guide in the title, but (not surprisingly) not one of them relates to the subject of nectar guides.Plantsurfer (talk) 10:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh, all right. I am not keen on the idea, but I suppose it is no show-stopper. Cheers. JonRichfield (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)