Talk:Neighborhood Internet service provider

WP:NOT

The Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Stick to discussions of noteworthy firms, and stop with the self-promotion. MrZaius^talk 14:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Peer Review on Neighborhood Internet Service Provider

To start, I clicked on view history and compared some of the article before your edits and after and you guys really made a lot of useful and effective edits. Your lead section is very strong and understandable because you do a great job of clearly defining and explaining what exactly the Neighborhood Internet Service Provider is. You also use citations in the lead section so that is helpful for the readers because they are able to view the link and confirm that it is from a reliable source. The lead is also strong because it summarizes the article’s key points but does not go into to much detail. One suggestion I have is that after the lead section, instead of going directly into advantages and disadvantages, you may want to talk a little about its history and evolution. Wikipedia pages are stronger when they follow a sense of chronology and it helps the reader understand more about the page if he or she knows how this entity has grown and evolved. The structure seems to be pretty clear but you could use some more headings and sub-headings to help guide the readers through the wikipedia page. The article seems to be nicely balanced between the different sections also, so good job there! It seems like advantages and disadvantages are more important than alternate options so it is good that you spent a little more time on those sections. I do think some expansion on each of those topics could create a stronger article. If you find a couple more external sources to reference and use to strengthen and deepen the article, I think you could make this already great article even better. Wikipedia articles with more references tend to be stronger and more informative so a couple more sources could definitely help. All your coverage about the Neighborhood Internet Service Provider seems to be neutral! It can sometimes be hard to hold a completely neutral point of view when writing about a certain topic so great job maintaining your unbiased point of view was impressive. I also looked through your sources. The first source I clicked on seems a bit weird. It is a five sentence article with no comments or anything so I am not totally convinced it is the most reliable source. However, I do trust that you did your research and confirmed what was said on this source so I think it is fine. Your other sources seem very reliable! Overall, great job! I think you could use a couple more citations, but you guys definitely helped create a stronger and more informative article that will help spread information about the Neighborhood Internet Service Provider. Mreiss9 (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neighborhood Internet service provider. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425223556/http://www.bbwexchange.com/neighborhood/index.asp to http://www.bbwexchange.com/neighborhood/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)